Path to Progress

View Original

Paving the Way to Gridlock: The Myth of Road Expansion

When faced with traffic congestion, the standard solution seems simple: build more lanes or add new highways. However, research and real-world examples show that this approach fails to solve the problem but often worsens it due to two fundamental phenomena: induced demand and latent demand.

Understanding Induced Demand

Induced demand occurs when road expansion encourages people to live farther away from their daily destinations, believing that additional lanes will make travel faster. Over time, these longer commutes lead to more cars on the road, negating the benefits of the expansion. Essentially, the promise of easier commutes creates more demand for road usage, eventually bringing traffic levels back—or even above—their original state.

The Role of Latent Demand

Latent demand, on the other hand, manifests immediately after a new road or lane opens. People who previously avoided congested highways—using alternative routes or traveling at off-peak hours—are now drawn to the newly expanded road, assuming it will be faster. This sudden influx of additional vehicles overwhelms the new capacity almost immediately.

The False Promise of Road Expansion

Let’s say a highway originally served 10,000 daily users but was expanded to accommodate rising traffic levels. After expansion, the combination of induced and latent demand might increase usage to 15,000 vehicles daily. Instead of easing congestion, the added lane now causes even more delays for the original users.

Bigger Roads, Bigger Problems

Expanding highways also pave the way for sprawling development, making communities less walkable and more car-dependent. Exclusionary zoning regulations, which separate residential, commercial, and recreational spaces, force people to live farther from schools, grocery stores, restaurants, and workplaces. This sprawling design funnels everyone onto the same highways, worsening congestion and perpetuating a vicious cycle of car dependency.

A Better Alternative: Mixed-Use Development

Instead of perpetually widening roads, cities should invest in mixed-use development. These communities integrate homes, schools, businesses, and public spaces, reducing the need for long car commutes. By creating neighborhoods where walking, cycling, and public transit are viable options, cities can reduce car dependency while still accommodating drivers.

The goal isn’t to eliminate driving but to provide people with the freedom to choose how they travel. Mixed-use development fosters more equitable and sustainable urban spaces while reducing highway pressure.

Conclusion

Building more lanes might seem like a straightforward solution to traffic, but the reality is far more complex. Induced and latent demand ensures that road expansions often create more problems than they solve. By rethinking how we design our cities and prioritizing walkability and mixed-use development, we can address the root causes of congestion and build a more sustainable, accessible future.

Published By: Annabelle Hanke

Links:

https://environment.transportation.org/teri-idea/induced-demand-from-operational-efficiency-and-the-impact-on-ghg-emissions-part-1-synthesis/